freepik-export-20250107212301C5uc

Puerto Rico and 0% Capital gains

Puerto Rico and 0% Capital gains

A client reached out with the question and I felt its worth sharing with the audience – We anticipate significant capital gains in 2025, both long and short term. If we move to Puerto Rico next week, would we qualify for 0% capital gains for our 2025 taxes

If you move to Puerto Rico next week and meet the requirements to become a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico, you may qualify for a 0% tax rate on capital gains for your 2025 taxes, but this depends on several factors.

If you meet all these requirements, you can exclude from U.S. federal income tax any capital gains that accrue after you become a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico. However, any gains that accrued before you became a resident will still be subject to U.S. federal income tax. Therefore, for capital gains realized in 2025, only the portion of the gains that accrue after you establish bona fide residency in Puerto Rico will be eligible for the 0% tax rate.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.

freepik-export-20250107212248yPhq

Section 83(b) Election

Section 83(b) Election

A Section 83(b) election is a tax election that allows employees or service providers who receive restricted property, such as stock, in connection with the performance of services to include the value of the property in their gross income at the time of transfer rather than when the property becomes vested. This election can be particularly relevant for startups, where equity compensation is a common practice. Below, we explore the pros and cons of making a Section 83(b) election, the process of making the election, the tax implications, and examples of when it might be beneficial or detrimental.

Pros and Cons of a Section 83(b) Election

Pros:

Cons:

Process of Making a Section 83(b) Election

Steps to Make the Election:

New IRS Form:

The IRS has introduced Form 15620, “Section 83(b) Election,” which standardizes the process and reduces the risk of filing errors. This form can be used instead of drafting a custom election statement [7].

Tax Implications

Inclusion in Gross Income:

Under Section 83(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), the recipient must include in gross income the excess of the fair market value of the property over the amount paid for the property at the first time the rights to the property are either transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture [1].

Election under Section 83(b):

If a Section 83(b) election is made, the recipient includes in gross income the fair market value of the property at the time of transfer, minus any amount paid for the property. This inclusion occurs in the taxable year in which the property is transferred, regardless of whether the property is substantially vested [1].

Basis and Holding Period:

The basis of the property is the amount paid for the property plus the amount included in gross income under the Section 83(b) election. The holding period for capital gains purposes begins just after the date the property is transferred [1].

Examples of When a Section 83(b) Election Might Be Beneficial or Detrimental

Beneficial Scenario:

Example 1: Alice receives restricted stock in a startup valued at $1 per share, with the potential to appreciate significantly. She makes a Section 83(b) election, including $1 per share in her gross income. Two years later, the stock is worth $10 per share. By making the election, Alice pays tax on the initial $1 per share and benefits from long-term capital gains treatment on the appreciation from $1 to $10 per share when she sells the stock.

Detrimental Scenario:

Example 2: Bob receives restricted stock in a startup valued at $5 per share. He makes a Section 83(b) election, including $5 per share in his gross income. However, the startup fails, and the stock becomes worthless. Bob cannot recover the taxes paid on the initial $5 per share inclusion, resulting in a financial loss.

Conclusion

A Section 83(b) election can be a powerful tool for employees and service providers in startups, allowing them to lock in the current value of restricted property and potentially benefit from lower capital gains tax rates on future appreciation. However, it also carries risks, including immediate tax liability and the potential for forfeiture. Careful consideration and planning are essential to determine whether making a Section 83(b) election is the right choice based on individual circumstances and the specific terms of the equity compensation.

For more detailed guidance, taxpayers should refer to the relevant sections of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and IRS guidelines, including IRC Section 83 and Treasury Regulations, as well as consult with a tax professional.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.

freepik-export-202501072122519VaX

Investing in Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZs): A Comprehensive Guide

Investing in Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZs): A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZs) were established under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to spur economic development and job creation in distressed communities. By offering significant tax incentives, the program encourages investors to reinvest their capital gains into Qualified Opportunity Funds (QOFs) that, in turn, invest in QOZs. This article explores the tax benefits, eligibility criteria, types of qualifying investments, the process of investing in QOFs, and special considerations or risks associated with these investments.

Tax Benefits

Investing in QOZs offers three primary tax benefits:

Eligibility Criteria

To qualify for these tax benefits, several criteria must be met:

Types of Investments That Qualify
Process of Investing in QOFs
Special Considerations and Risks
Examples of QOZ Investments

Conclusion

Investing in Qualified Opportunity Zones offers significant tax benefits, including deferral, reduction, and potential elimination of capital gains taxes. By understanding the eligibility criteria, types of qualifying investments, and the process of investing in QOFs, investors can make informed decisions to maximize their tax advantages while contributing to the economic development of distressed communities. However, it is crucial to consider the associated risks and stay informed about regulatory changes to ensure compliance and optimize investment outcomes.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.

freepik-export-202501072119160E9X

Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) as a Tool for Deferring Capital Gains

Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) as a Tool for Deferring Capital Gains

Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) have emerged as a popular vehicle for deferring capital gains, particularly in the context of real estate investments. This article explores the structure, benefits, and tax implications of DSTs, comparing them to other deferral methods such as Tenancy in Common (TIC) arrangements and like-kind exchanges under IRC § 1031. We will also delve into the legal framework, IRS guidelines, and special considerations for investors.

Structure of Delaware Statutory Trusts

A DST is a legal entity created under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, which allows for the holding, management, and operation of real estate properties. The trust is managed by a trustee, and investors hold beneficial interests in the trust, which represent their ownership in the underlying real estate assets. The DST structure is designed to be passive, with the trustee handling all management responsibilities, including leasing, maintenance, and financing.

Key features of a DST include:

Benefits of DSTs

DSTs offer several advantages for investors looking to defer capital gains:

Tax Implications

The tax treatment of DSTs is governed by several IRS guidelines and revenue rulings. Notably, Rev. Rul. 2004-86 clarifies that interests in a DST can qualify as like-kind property under § 1031, provided the DST meets specific requirements. These include the restriction on the trustee’s powers and the passive nature of the investment.

Comparisons to Other Deferral Methods

Tenancy in Common (TIC) Arrangements:

Like-Kind Exchanges under IRC § 1031:

Legal Framework and IRS Guidelines

The legal framework for DSTs is established under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, which provides the basis for their formation and operation. For tax purposes, the IRS has issued several guidelines and revenue rulings that outline the requirements for DSTs to qualify for § 1031 exchanges.

Key IRS guidelines include:

Special Considerations for Investors

Investors considering DSTs should be aware of several special considerations:

Conclusion

Delaware Statutory Trusts offer a compelling option for investors seeking to defer capital gains through real estate investments. With their passive structure, tax deferral benefits, and diversification opportunities, DSTs are an attractive alternative to TIC arrangements and traditional § 1031 exchanges. However, investors must carefully consider the legal framework, IRS guidelines, and special considerations to maximize the benefits of investing in DSTs.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.

freepik-export-20250107213148D6LY

LLC Tax Implications for Nonresident Aliens

LLC Tax Implications for Nonresident Aliens

1. Introduction

Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) have become a popular business structure among nonresident aliens due to their flexibility, limited liability protection, and potential tax advantages. An LLC can be structured to meet various business needs and can be classified differently for tax purposes, which can significantly impact the tax obligations of nonresident alien owners.

2. Tax Classification

LLCs can be classified for tax purposes in three primary ways:

3. Disregarded Entity

When an LLC is treated as a disregarded entity, the nonresident alien owner is taxed directly on the LLC’s income. The income is reported on the owner’s tax return, and the LLC itself does not file a separate tax return. The tax implications include:

4. Partnership

When an LLC is treated as a partnership, the tax implications for nonresident aliens include:

5. Form 5472

Nonresident aliens owning U.S. LLCs classified as disregarded entities or 25% foreign-owned U.S. corporations must comply with specific reporting requirements:

6. Tax Treaties

Tax treaties between the U.S. and other countries can significantly impact the taxation of nonresident aliens owning an LLC. These treaties can:

7. Withholding Tax

Under IRC § 1446, partnerships must withhold tax on the ECTI allocable to foreign partners. The key points include:

8. Electing C Corporation Status

Nonresident aliens may elect for their LLC to be treated as a C corporation by filing Form 8832. The benefits and drawbacks include:

9. Conclusion

Understanding the tax implications of owning an LLC as a nonresident alien is crucial for compliance and optimization. The classification of the LLC for tax purposes, the impact of tax treaties, and the specific filing requirements such as Form 5472 must be carefully considered. Consulting with tax professionals is essential to navigate the complexities and ensure compliance with U.S. tax laws.

By understanding these key points and leveraging professional advice, nonresident aliens can effectively manage their U.S. LLC investments and minimize their tax liabilities.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.

freepik-export-20250107212719BRPR

Importance of social security planning for US Citizens

Importance of social security planning for US Citizens

Social Security planning is a critical aspect of financial planning for U.S. citizens, particularly as they approach retirement age. The Social Security program, established in 1935, provides a safety net for retirees, disabled individuals, and survivors of deceased workers. Understanding the nuances of Social Security benefits and strategically planning for them can significantly impact one’s financial security in retirement. This article explores the importance of Social Security planning, the factors influencing benefits, and strategies to maximize these benefits.

Understanding Social Security Benefits

Social Security benefits are primarily based on an individual’s earnings history and the age at which they begin to claim benefits. The primary insurance amount (PIA) is the benefit a person receives if they retire at full retirement age (FRA), which varies depending on the year of birth. For instance, individuals born in 1960 or later have an FRA of 67 years. Benefits can be claimed as early as age 62, but doing so results in a permanent reduction in monthly benefits. Conversely, delaying benefits past the FRA up to age 70 increases the monthly benefit due to delayed retirement credits.

Factors Influencing Social Security Benefits

Several factors influence the amount of Social Security benefits an individual can receive:

Importance of Social Security Planning
Strategies for Maximizing Social Security Benefits

Conclusion

Social Security planning is a vital component of retirement planning for U.S. citizens. By understanding the factors that influence Social Security benefits and employing strategic planning, individuals can maximize their benefits and ensure greater financial security in retirement. Given the complexities involved, consulting with a financial advisor who specializes in Social Security planning can provide valuable guidance and help individuals make informed decisions that align with their long-term financial goals.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.

freepik-export-20250107212512ANzn

How stock options are taxed?

How stock options are taxed?

Stock options are a common form of compensation provided to employees, allowing them to purchase company stock at a predetermined price. The tax treatment of stock options depends on whether they are classified as nonstatutory stock options (NSOs) or incentive stock options (ISOs). This article will explore the tax implications of both types of stock options, referencing relevant sections of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and Treasury Regulations.

Nonstatutory Stock Options (NSOs)

Grant and Exercise

Nonstatutory stock options are not taxed at the time of grant if they do not have a readily ascertainable fair market value. According to IRC § 83(a), the taxation event occurs at the time of exercise. The employee must include in their gross income the difference between the fair market value of the stock at the time of exercise and the exercise price paid for the stock. This amount is considered compensation income and is subject to ordinary income tax, as well as employment taxes (FICA and FUTA) [1].

Example

If an employee is granted an NSO to purchase 1,000 shares at $10 per share, and the stock’s fair market value at the time of exercise is $30 per share, the employee recognizes $20,000 ($30,000 fair market value – $10,000 exercise price) as compensation income.

Sale of Stock

Upon the sale of the stock, the employee may realize a capital gain or loss. The holding period for determining whether the gain or loss is short-term or long-term begins on the date the stock becomes substantially vested (i.e., when it is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture).

Incentive Stock Options (ISOs)

Grant and Exercise

Incentive stock options are not taxed at the time of grant or exercise, provided certain conditions are met. Under IRC § 422(a), no income is recognized upon the exercise of an ISO if the stock is held for at least two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise. However, the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the stock at the time of exercise is a preference item for the alternative minimum tax (AMT).

Example

If an employee is granted an ISO to purchase 1,000 shares at $10 per share, and the stock’s fair market value at the time of exercise is $30 per share, no regular income tax is due at exercise. However, the $20,000 difference is included in the AMT calculation.

Sale of Stock

If the holding period requirements are met, any gain or loss upon the sale of the stock is treated as a long-term capital gain or loss. If the stock is sold before meeting the holding period requirements (a disqualifying disposition), the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value at the time of exercise is taxed as ordinary income, and any additional gain is treated as a capital gain.

Special Considerations

Section 83(b) Election

Employees receiving stock options may make a § 83(b) election to include the fair market value of the stock at the time of transfer in their gross income, even if the stock is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. This election must be made within 30 days of the transfer and can result in significant tax savings if the stock appreciates substantially.

Reporting Requirements

Employers must report compensation income from NSOs on Form W-2 and may need to withhold taxes. For ISOs, no withholding is required, but the income must be reported for AMT purposes. Brokers executing same-day sales of stock acquired through option exercises may be exempt from reporting the sale on Form 1099-B if certain conditions are met.

Conclusion

The tax treatment of stock options can be complex, involving various rules and regulations. Understanding the differences between NSOs and ISOs, the timing of income recognition, and the potential impact of the AMT is crucial for employees and employers alike. Consulting with a tax advisor is recommended to navigate these complexities and optimize tax outcomes.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.

freepik-export-20250107212301C5uc

Cost Segregation: A Powerful Tool to save on Taxes

Cost Segregation: A Powerful Tool to save on Taxes

Cost segregation is a strategic tax planning tool that allows property owners to accelerate depreciation deductions, thereby reducing taxable income and increasing cash flow. This technique involves identifying and reclassifying personal property assets and land improvements that are typically embedded in a building’s construction or acquisition costs. By segregating these costs, property owners can take advantage of shorter depreciation periods under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS), leading to significant tax savings.

Understanding Cost Segregation

Cost segregation studies dissect the costs associated with a building into various components, each with its own depreciation schedule. The primary goal is to identify assets that can be depreciated over shorter periods, such as 5, 7, or 15 years, instead of the standard 27.5 years for residential rental property or 39 years for nonresidential real property.

Key Components of a Cost Segregation Study

Legal Framework and IRS Guidance

The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and Treasury Regulations provide the legal basis for cost segregation. Specifically, IRC Section 168 and the associated Treasury Regulations outline the rules for MACRS depreciation. The IRS has also issued various rulings and memoranda that support the use of cost segregation studies.

Key Legal Precedents

Benefits of Cost Segregation

Conducting a Cost Segregation Study

A cost segregation study should be conducted by qualified professionals, such as engineers, accountants, and tax advisors, who have expertise in construction and tax law. The study involves a detailed analysis of construction documents, invoices, and other relevant records to identify and classify assets.

Steps in a Cost Segregation Study

Considerations and Risks

While cost segregation offers substantial tax benefits, it is essential to consider the following:

Conclusion

Cost segregation is a powerful tax-saving tool that can provide significant financial benefits to property owners. By accelerating depreciation deductions, property owners can reduce their tax liabilities, increase cash flow, and reinvest the savings into their business. However, it is essential to conduct a cost segregation study with the help of qualified professionals to ensure compliance with IRS regulations and maximize the benefits.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.

freepik-export-20250107212248yPhq

Deferring Capital Gains: Strategies and Considerations

Deferring Capital Gains: Strategies and Considerations

Deferring capital gains can be a powerful tool for taxpayers looking to manage their tax liabilities and maximize their investment returns. Several mechanisms within the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) allow for the deferral of capital gains, each with its own set of rules, benefits, and limitations. This article explores the primary methods for deferring capital gains, including like-kind exchanges under IRC § 1031, the Opportunity Zone program, and other alternative structures.

Like-Kind Exchanges Under IRC § 1031

One of the most well-known methods for deferring capital gains is through a like-kind exchange under IRC § 1031. This provision allows taxpayers to defer recognition of gain or loss when they exchange real property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment, provided the property is exchanged for other real property of like kind.

Key Requirements:

Special Considerations:
Opportunity Zone Program

The Opportunity Zone program, established by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), offers another avenue for deferring capital gains. This program allows taxpayers to defer, reduce, and potentially eliminate capital gains by investing in Qualified Opportunity Funds (QOFs) that invest in designated Opportunity Zones.

Key Benefits:
Special Considerations:

Alternative Structures

In addition to like-kind exchanges and Opportunity Zones, other structures can be used to defer capital gains, including Tenancy in Common (TIC) arrangements, Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs), and deferred sales trusts.

Tenancy in Common (TIC) and Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs):

Deferred Sales Trusts:

Conclusion

Deferring capital gains can provide significant tax benefits and enhance investment returns. Taxpayers should carefully consider the various options available, including like-kind exchanges under IRC § 1031, the Opportunity Zone program, and alternative structures like TICs, DSTs, and deferred sales trusts. Each method has specific requirements and considerations, and consulting with a knowledgeable tax advisor is essential to navigate these complex rules and optimize tax outcomes.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.

freepik-export-202501072122519VaX

Differences Between Active and Passive Investors in Real Estate

Differences Between Active and Passive Investors in Real Estate

Definitions

Active Investors: Active investors in real estate are those who are significantly involved in the management and operations of their properties. This includes activities such as making decisions about property improvements, tenant selection, and day-to-day management. Active investors often qualify as real estate professionals under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 469, which allows them to deduct losses from their real estate activities against other types of income.

Passive Investors: Passive investors, on the other hand, are those who invest in real estate but do not materially participate in the management or operations of the properties. Their involvement is limited to providing capital and perhaps some oversight, but they do not engage in the regular, continuous, and substantial activities required to be considered active participants.

Tax Implications

Passive Activity Loss Rules: Under IRC § 469, passive activity losses (PALs) are generally not deductible against non-passive income, such as wages or active business income. Instead, these losses can only offset income from other passive activities. If passive losses exceed passive income, the excess losses are carried forward to future years until they can be used to offset passive income or until the property is disposed of in a taxable transaction.

$25,000 Offset for Active Participation: IRC § 469(i) provides an exception for individuals who actively participate in rental real estate activities. These individuals can deduct up to $25,000 of passive losses against non-passive income. To qualify, the taxpayer must own at least 10% of the rental property and be involved in management decisions, such as approving new tenants and setting rental terms. This deduction is subject to a phase-out based on adjusted gross income (AGI).

Phase-Out Rules Based on AGI: The $25,000 offset begins to phase out when a taxpayer’s AGI exceeds $100,000 and is completely phased out at an AGI of $150,000. The phase-out reduces the $25,000 allowance by 50% of the amount by which the taxpayer’s AGI exceeds $100,000.

Criteria for Qualifying as a Real Estate Professional

To qualify as a real estate professional under IRC § 469(c)(7), a taxpayer must meet two main criteria:

If these criteria are met, the taxpayer’s rental real estate activities are not automatically considered passive, and losses from these activities can offset other types of income.

Examples and Relevant Case Law

Example 1: John is a full-time real estate agent who spends over 1,000 hours a year managing his rental properties. He meets both the 50% personal services and the 750-hour requirements, qualifying him as a real estate professional. Therefore, his rental losses can offset his other income, such as commissions from real estate sales.

Example 2: Sarah owns a rental property and is involved in making management decisions but does not spend more than 750 hours a year on these activities. She qualifies for the $25,000 offset for active participation, but her AGI is $120,000. The phase-out reduces her allowable offset by $10,000 (50% of the $20,000 excess over $100,000), leaving her with a $15,000 offset.

Case Law: Conner, Barry G. et ux. v. Commissioner: In this case, the taxpayers, Barry and Bridget Conner, were involved in various real estate activities through limited liability companies (LLCs). The Tax Court and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Conners’ losses from their LLCs were limited under IRC § 469 because they did not materially participate in the activities. The courts emphasized the importance of meeting the material participation requirements to avoid the passive activity loss limitations.

Case Law: Langille, Deanna v. Commissioner: Deanna Langille was involved in both a law practice and real estate activities. The Tax Court found that she did not qualify as a real estate professional because she did not meet the 50% personal services or the 750-hour requirements. Consequently, her rental losses were considered passive and could not offset her non-passive income.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences between active and passive investors in real estate is crucial for tax planning and compliance. Active investors who qualify as real estate professionals can benefit from more favorable tax treatment, including the ability to offset rental losses against other income. Passive investors, however, are subject to the passive activity loss rules, which limit the deductibility of their losses. The $25,000 offset for active participation provides some relief, but it is subject to phase-out based on AGI. Case law, such as Conner, Barry G. et ux. v. Commissioner and Langille, Deanna v. Commissioner, illustrates the application of these rules and the importance of meeting the material participation requirements.

Author of this article Jack Chaudhary specializes in Individual, Corporate Tax returns, Foreign Taxes, Expats, Non-resident Taxes, Payroll, Crypto and e-Commerce. With the Enrolled Agent credential, Jack represents taxpayers before the IRS and state taxing authorities. He zealously advocates for his clients to ensure the best results are achieved. Book an appointment here with him for a consultation call.